Reviews

Review: Steam Link

steam-link-8-470-75.jpg

Top Brands

Previous ArticleReview: PS Vita
Comments (25)
  1. Kieran Kunde says:

    This simply isn't true. The game support is fairly limited based on my testing today. 35 out of 140 games were playable with a controller. 25% is definitely not 'most'.

  2. Osborne Rogahn V says:

    For a smart fella, you sure missed the point completely. I hate to be too simplistic here, but you do understand that people want to work in isolated areas "when working"? It's not hard concept…

  3. Mrs. Vicenta Runolfsson says:

    Hello readers,

    Hope you enjoyed the review. Just wanted to point out that I recently made some revisions regarding my understanding about how the Link works with the internet.

    I mistakenly assumed that the quality of the stream leaned on the muscle of your internet speed, but, in truth, it really all depends on the throughput of your local connection and the quality of your networking gear. I recognize that it's a pretty big detail to mess up on, but wanted to be transparent with you all.

  4. Laura Marvin III says:

    silly peasant, time to drop 50k into a home remodel.

  5. Julio Sanford IV says:

    Thanks. Good to know, because relying on the Internet connection would've been a complete deal-breaker for me.

  6. Maegan Bechtelar says:

    "You'll hear excuses every time you bring this up that "my computer isn't near my TV", which to me is like saying "my dining room table isn't near my chairs so I have to stand while I eat"."

    That is a pretty stupid analogy, especially coming from someone who thinks everybody ELSE is the idiot.

    So I'm supposed to move my work + gaming PC and large desk out of my upstairs office and into my living room for the sake of having it close to my TV?

    Do you by any chance live by yourself in a small apartment/flat rather than an actual house?

    "plan your house layout for maximum entertainment"

    Are you joking?… How is re-organising the layout of your house so that you can run an HDMI cable from your PC to your TV more convenient than just buying a streaming box like the Steam Link and not having to do any of that? Did you think before you typed a single word of your post?

    You can't see any usage scenario other than your own… Idiot

  7. Brando Ritchie says:

    all hail to Vin B one of the few non idiots in our society.

  8. Charles Volkman Jr. says:

    you are making a case for stuff no one cares about. Ppl just want a wireless option to connect their TVs with their PCs. HDMI doesnt do that. If ppl dont want to have a PC next to their TV's who are you to say that's bad planning? End of story

  9. Dr. Jon Feeney IV says:

    "What this facilitates is not what you are requesting. It assumes that you have a PC gaming area that is distant from your TV area."

    Here's the point you're missing, in every single post. What it *actually* assumes is that you have a TV that is far from your PC gaming area. I know that sounds like what you said, but it isn't.

    I happen to have my PC set up in what sounds like the same sort of setup you have – it replaces media players of all kinds, because I have it hooked up to my living room TV as well as a monitor on my computer desk. I don't need a Roku, a Blu-ray player, a stereo/amp, or any other media device in my living room.

    But here's the thing… I *also* have a TV in my bedroom, with nothing but a cable box connected to it. If I wanted the ability to play my games on that TV from time to time – or any other TV in a separate room – what is your non-idiot solution that costs less than $50?

  10. Mrs. Pearlie Casper PhD says:

    That's an easy enough issue to design around. Most people simply don't put much thought into it and overpaying to create separate spaces requires less thinking to achieve.

    So yea, I get what you are saying. Unfortunately I'm far beyond that concept and trying to explain it further is pointless if you don't get it already.

  11. Ms. Helena Wolff says:

    What's discouraging about this review is the lack of information on just how poorly the Steam Controller works with most games and just how FEW games have controller support. In my library of 140 games only about 35 or so support the controller. The Steam Controller, while interesting, is simply poorly designed for most games. Despite what many reviewers say it DOES need a 2nd analog stick and the buttons are far too close to one another to be playable. Thankfully other controllers do work to varying degrees (but still FAR better than the Steam Controller itself).

    Game support / game playability should have gone hand in hand with the overall assessment of Steam Link and no way in hell would a reasonable person give it a 5 star with such limited support.

  12. Carey Hamill II says:

    Your assertion falls apart here:

    "most people want a separate area to work that's FAR removed from any recreational activities"

    In which case, that's not a gaming computer and it won't need to be shared to anything else.

    What this facilitates is not what you are requesting. It assumes that you have a PC gaming area that is distant from your TV area.

    A PC gaming area is not "far removed" from recreational activity, it is recreational activity.

    If you are already blurring the lines between them by having a gaming computer be your work space, then the difference we are discussing is size of the TV in each location.

    The problem is your ideology is flawed from the outset.

    Either you want a 100% separate work space, in which case it shouldn't be a gaming computer and won't need to be sling cast to a larger TV at any time.

    Or you have already blurred the lines and mixed some of your recreational activity with your work area and now are trying to access a larger TV occasionally. In which case proper planning would have allowed for an all in one solution and the focus on work versus play is entirely situational and up to you.

    Which is already the choice you face if your work computer is the one you are streaming PC games from.

    So don't proclaim this is for people who want 100% completely separate work spaces. They've already compromised that by having PC games there and mixed recreation with work. This device just lets you stream to another location which still didn't need to exist most of the time.

    Modern televisions aren't any different than monitors anymore and haven't been for more than a decade.

    A complete solution is possible in one room at a lower cost with a higher end point value of equipment.

    The reason you don't understand this is because you still view the television as being anything other than just a monitor and you demand that work and recreation must be separate things when in fact the difference is how you treat the space from moment to moment, not the equipment you use in it.

    If you are streaming from a so called "Work" computer, you've already blurred the lines. Consolidate and innovate the concept.

    Or keep them 100% separate, in which case you don't have anything to stream and still don't need this box.

  13. Mrs. Taryn Simonis says:

    235M X 23M!! And thinks that is slow for streaming from a gaming PC? Can anyone else confirm that you need a half Gig of bandwidth from their ISP to stream high settings, or was it the 960?

    Thanks!

  14. Madonna Roberts says:

    These technologies have changed and advanced over the years in ways that there's very little opportunity to plan ahead in any meaningful way (based on connectivity changes, computing changes / buy patterns, etc). Couple that with the simple fact that most people have a work space (home office) and an entertainment space (living room / den). Two distinct places that in this instance collide only when PC gaming enters the picture.

    So brilliant man with the 169 IQ. If these idiots plan ahead and put their work PC in the living room by their televisions, so they're not wasting all their hard earned money for streaming content, how are they supposed to access that work PC now in their work area? Another computer? RDP? VNC? Other?

    Keep in mind on the planning front, most people want a separate area to work that's FAR removed from any recreational activities, especially those accompanied by annoying auditory noise levels. See, that's the thing. These idiots have planned ahead, and why your assertion they have not sounds so foolish to most of the people who have responded.

  15. Dr. Vern Parker PhD says:

    Exactly. Vins arguments are ludicrous. Not one person has agreed with him thus far, but I guarantee you he still thinks he's correct. People want to keep their systems in a separate room (insert reason here) and still enjoy gaming on the big screen. Buying a $50 box to enable that is far easier than Vins proposals. It's that simple.

    I have the SteamLink now and it works great. Now the SteamController, that thing is garbage, but Link itself is great, and far simpler / less hassle than Vins foolish proposals.

  16. Vicky Hodkiewicz says:

    I do that… in my living room. I also have a bedroom.

  17. Alexandra Jacobs says:

    My mistake for this oversight. This came to my attention a few days ago and I've updated the review to reflect this.

  18. Joaquin Grady says:

    Perhaps realtive to his choices of game, it is most. But your information is a bit more useful in suggesting prospective buyers exercise caution with their expectations of possible game options.

  19. Julien Bosco says:

    Yep, you could that! It's how I play Titanfall on Steam. :)

  20. Pascale Kulas says:

    Because we can :)

  21. Garrick Rutherford says:

    I thought the Steam Link streamed all its data over the LAN/Wi-Fi. Why does the author keep going on about needing a fast Internet connection?

  22. Kieran Brown DDS says:

    can it run any game

  23. Rosie Mann says:

    shes probably a cow, one of those on TLC who cant leave the house because the doorway is too tiny

  24. Carolyn Koepp says:

    You spend double or more on display systems, streaming devices, seating arrangements and whatever else you are duplicating without even thinking about it.

    But people like pretending that spending extra money makes them smart.

    I understand every usage scenario, and any that involve this are more expensive for no extra functionality.

  25. Prof. Amber Gerlach says:

    I have a suggestion – should be very easy for someone with 169IQ and artistic soul.
    Change your perspective. Many people plan their entertainment at home around other living spaces. In your case it seems that entertainment room is main one, you plan rest around it – in this case you have valid points (but calling everyone an idiot just because have different view does not show you as artist or intelligent).
    But if you plan our entertainment room around everything else?
    I want to have an office to work with my PC (which is also a gaming PC), I have a bedroom, rooms for children, living room for admitting quests/family time.
    If I want to play games – I do it in my office. I want to watch film with family – we do it in living room.
    Want to play lego game with my son – I stream it to living room (unless occupied, than I use my office).
    I do not understand why, for sake of some savings, I would combine my office with living room?
    Please help me, as my IQ is only 115…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology Demo

Also visit
Our Partners