PC's

Hands on: Surface Studio review

image

Top Brands

Comments (21)
  1. Terroantula says:

    Man that’s way more expensive than an iMac…

  2. severn sea says:

    The price isn’t exorbitant. There are plenty of AIOs out there that don’t have a touchscreen, or that do but you can’t use with a digital pen. Or that don’t drop to the angles that this one does. Or that don’t have the colour-switching capabilities, and so on. There are so many of these little nuances on this machine that add up to a fantastic piece of kit that is unrivalled.

    The point is you go into a DIY store and you look at the price of professional tools – why pay £200 for a drill when you can buy one for £50? – but then you use the tools and you realise why the professionals buy them and pay the money.

  3. MattMe says:

    I know if this had Pascal graphics it would have been amazing, but realistically a 980M in a device of this intended purpose is more than enough. It’s still plenty good enough to play all modern games at a respectable level. Only a few months ago it was basically the best low power GPU you could wish for. It’s a shame everyone latches on to that.

    This is one of those devices, like the Surface Book, that I have no requirement for but I want one anyway.
    Microsoft are top of their game right now.

  4. PeterHamlin says:

    I’ve had a Surface Pro 3 for about a year and love it. But it works best at close quarters, and for my “desktops” I have more conventional setups. (A MacBook Pro provided by my employer at work, and a tricked-out non-touch Win10 laptop for a home music production studio.)

    I’m maybe a year away from upgrading the home studio, and was thinking of building it around a Surface Pro and a docking station, but something like the Surface Studio just might be the answer.

  5. runolfsdottir.lee says:
    1. severn sea says:

      The worst thing is you’re missing the fact that touch screens now have oleophobic coatings that are so good that you can use them all day long without needing to clean them or worry about greasy finger smears. These hugely impressive coatings also reject dust a hundred times better than screens used to.

      Can’t speak for other people but I’m not one for using anything with greasy hands and like to keep my screens clean anyway.

    2. severn sea says:

      You’re obviously not creative enough to appreciate that there are products out there that are as good as and in fact now much better than anything Apple has to offer. I feel sorry for anybody who fails to realise that the world has moved on since the the likes of the MacBook were first introduced.

      As an example, you only have to look at the Touch bar to recognise the fact that Apple now have an outdated operating system that is unsuitable for touch and this is the best alternative they could come up with.

      In fact it’s rather naive and short sighted not to recognise the fact, the sort of attitude I would expect from a rank amateur. Your loss though, there are plenty of professionals out there using products other than Apple and are doing rather well for themselves.

    3. severn sea says:

      No, you’re just being pedantic. It’s perfectly obvious to everybody else that “products at all price points” means the range of products they have, not the main event.

    4. Cluck TheChicken says:

      Take a look at the LENOVO
      IdeaCentre AIO 910 – pretty much where MS stole their idea from.

      1. severn sea says:

        I don’t think it’s fair to say they stole the idea. I see your point but most AIOs look pretty much the same to begin with, and there are a few with a lot of adjustment on the hinges, but I think it’s about there that the comparisons end.

        The Lenovo does make a decent cheaper alternative though and I like the fact that you can turn the monitor on without having to turn on the rest of the PC. However the touchscreen model is only available with an i5 processor and the huge bezel, which has to be the thickest I have ever seen, makes it look dated and does spoil the appearance somewhat.

    5. Trevor White says:

      Wacom is pricy, but their pens are superior – the tech used in the Surface pens has a bit of a jitter problem, requires more initial activation force (meaning it’s more difficult to get light strokes), and has fewer pressure levels. However it’s still not bad, and it’s good that the Surface & iPad Pro is forcing Wacom to actually innovate – its new displays coming out in Dec finally have improved accuracy, less latency, and a huge jump in pressure sensitivity (though I think it’ll be hard to tell the difference in pressure in real world use).

      1. severn sea says:

        Are people saying that the Surface pen is jittery because that is what they have read elsewhere, or from experience? I only ask because I use one daily with a Surface Pro 4, i5 processor, and I have never experienced any jitter whatsoever.

        When making light strokes the screen must be absolutely clean for best results – I only mention it because I saw a YouTube video where an “artist” was complaining about it but he was using a demo Studio at the launch venue, and when the camera caught the reflective light you could see that the screen just needed a good clean – but if it is, it seems fine to me, I have been hugely impressed with the pen.

    6. Rann Xeroxx says:

      Apple took the glowing fruit away. How will everyone at the Starbucks see your beacon of individuality across the room? Maybe vigorously swipe your fingers across the touch bar while mixing some def tunes, something like Moby. That should get their attention.

      :)

    7. Rann Xeroxx says:

      I have a Dell XPS with a touch screen and I never see smudges. That’s because when its on, smudges simply do not show up with the screen brightness. I clean my screens (regardless if they are touch) once a week anyway.

      Touch screen iPads seem to be so popular that Apple has not felt the need to add mousing to iOS.

    8. Rann Xeroxx says:

      You might want to look at the Razor Blade Pro. Far better spend for high end portable workstation that is far more powerful and has far more features.

    9. Rann Xeroxx says:

      I agree with the idea of having this as just a monitor that, say, a Surface Pro could plug into or even a high end tower. I would not be surprised if that actually gets made next year.

    10. Eric_SB says:

      You can’t compare this superb, ground-breaking product with 28″ touchscreen and Surface Dial to the boring, grossly-overpriced MacBook with gimmick Touch Bar and only 16gb of ram. MacBook also runs the buggy OS X, which is far inferior to Windows 10 Professional.

      The products are in different classes, Microsoft has created something revolutionary here.

      1. Rann Xeroxx says:

        I am more of a Microsoft fan but even I would not suggest Mac OS is more buggy than Windows 10. The thing about W10 is that its innovation dial is set to 11 and is just screaming with new features every quarter. Mac is more stable, its just a bit stale.

        1. Graham Fluet says:

          I haven’t used mac in a while, but isn’t their cloud stuff a little glitchy still? Like nearly everything that relies on Apple Servers (which probably haven’t been upgraded ever since the Xserve was discontinued)?

    11. PeterHamlin says:

      Yes, this is my take too. My Surface Pro 4 pen is excellent. After trying a Cintiq, I could notice the quality, but it also made me realize how good the SP pen is too.

    12. BoltmanLives says:

      Surface Pro 4 is $749 right now “while supplies last” and its the best version the one I have the M3, Why? Fanless and lighter, more battery PERFECT ($150 off now)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology Demo

Also visit
Our Partners